Anachronism
Anachronism: an act of attributing a custom, event, or
object to a period to which it does not belong (Oxford Languages). I had to
look up that word online after reading it in Witchcraft: A Short
Introduction. This word does a great job of encapsulating our efforts as a
class in terms of our analysis of witchcraft from a 21st century perspective.
Our goal is to study some of the seemingly crazy events from the past without
reducing its validity from a given time period. I find it remarkably easy to
apply our modern research and ideologies to the texts we have read; therefore,
I have been making significant mental efforts to refrain from this practice of
anachronism. Overall, it is difficult to not accidentally engage in anachronism.
After all, how thoroughly can one constantly monitor their thoughts as they
happen, while also digesting the text itself. However, it would be foolish to
pretend like these types of relatively nonsensical stories / legends do not
occur in society to this day (on smaller, lower-stake levels, at least). We
have examined many sources of modern-day / residual witchcraft-related beliefs
in this class, including eBay offerings of special items, for one. Just today I
was scrolling through my feed of TikTok, when I stumbled upon a 2-minute post
about a cursed Arabic book. In the first 30 seconds, I thought the video must
be a joke or lead into something else, as the internet often behaves. However,
I eventually realized that the narrator in the clip was dead serious, and made
the viewer believe not only in what he was saying, but also that he was
genuinely warning the public not to read this specific book. Given the fact that
this post has 6.5 million views and 900 thousand likes, I think it is safe to
say that a decent amount of people believe this man’s story, or were at least
captivated by its premise. The narrator immediately grabs the viewer’s
attention and establishes some level of credibility by prefacing the content with
“True Horrifying Story,” “Warning: This is not a joke”; then his opening
statement: “this book is life-threatening” and “this is the most dangerous book
ever.” Throughout the video, he mentions several times that this book is easily
accessible online, as if to use reverse psychology to tempt the viewers into
reading the content. Shams al Ma’arif is the name of the book, and it
was written in the 13th century by a man named Ahmad bin Al Buni. Apparently,
Ahmad practiced black magic and was in close contact with jinn entities. The book
provides detailed instructions on how to interact with jinn, marry a jinn, and
the sacrifices required in the name of the devil himself. Similarly, I read on
page 103 of our text how in the year 1645, some teenager named Rebecca West
apparently had sex with and married the devil. I am curious as to the
fascination with literally marrying demonic entities; where does that come from
and what does marriage have to do with anything? I suppose marrying the devil
fits the implications of how far a witch would go to commit herself to evil,
but in any case, does this mean people thought the devil was married to
hundreds of witches? People thought Satan had a whole harem of evil women? Sometimes
when I ask these questions, I fear I am accidentally engaging in anachronism due
to my 21st century perspective on things. Anyways, I found it
interesting how in the video I saw online, it was a man who accidentally
married a female jinn, contrary to the typical, sexist prejudice against
females in regard to participating in demonic practices.
Here is the link to the video I referenced: https://vm.tiktok.com/TTPd5FnT9N/?k=1
Wow, amazing. I followed the link. Interesting video. I wonder who the speaker is, and I would guess that he is an Iman, a Muslim cleric. Though I am not sure. We should let the class take a look. What really interests me, though, is your use of anachronism and how it applies to our work. The usual meaning of the word relates to something or someone out of place in time, something belonging in the past. But as you correctly note it also refers to imposing meanings from one time period on the past, such as our interpreting the Salem events according to our contemporary notions. People in the past, and certainly the people of Salem, saw the world utterly differently than we do, and we need to acknowledge that our "truths" might not be any more valid than their "truths." REally a great post, thanks.
ReplyDelete